This past week has been very frustrating for we MAGA supporters. We voted Donald Trump into office to clean up the dumpster-fire that the Demented Biden administration left us. On some issues, he has made an excellent start. One is dealing with the numerous illegal aliens who have committed crimes. Every day, we hear of more arrests and deportations, including a raid at a California marijuana plantation, where illegal alien children were used as slave labor.

Other issues have been handled very badly by the new Justice Department leaders Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino. Here are some opinions.


Now, on another front…
Something else entirely.

Readers, please weigh in on the Court of Public Opinion!
Ms Ghislane, why should we believe you are supplying an accurate client list, with only provably guilty names?
This Epste
If this child abuse ring had an actual list of abusers, it would be the first one ever.
They set up a meme-theme, and are now screaming because reality isn’t a meme; Trump already used what they best could when they arrested Epstein, even though it couldn’t be used as evidence for most of it. (Building a case on stuff against an incredibly rich guy? Too easy to take out your support– you use it to get better evidence that is specifically for the guys you take out.)
Remember how Trump’s Federal pedo catcher event was bigger than anybody else has ever managed, over and over?
And how we keep having pedo rings taken out by ICE, based off of stuff they had before but were blocked from using?
Somebody wants us angry. And not at the folks who have been covering for pedos, but at the one guy who pushed back on Epstein procuring on his property, supported his nobody of a victim, which ended up getting him arrested the first time– which arguably resulted in him finally being put away.
And Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself was noted, by the folks who first recognized “oh, suuuuuure,” to include “here’s a rope and an opportunity, you off you Or Else.”
*************
this is dummy long, because it’s a quote from over at According to Hoyt, where I tried to explain how these rings work. I noticed during the mandatory predator identification training we had with the home schooling group (we borrowed Church property, so had to be certified) that it matches terrorism, and went digging, and I think this is a not entirely bad summary of why there won’t be a list, there’s a bunch of evidence. Which has been improperly held by Democrats for 4+ years.
It’s a child abuse ring.
If you’re one of the folks who has watched the other ones that came apart– like the ones in Fandom– that’s not quite how they work.
It’s more … implied.
Kind of like a buddy-buddy network, and they do a slow pull in on folks.
Epstein got going, and kept going, because he looked shady, but it was normal shady.
“Rich guy runs an investment company from a tropical island for completely locked down customer lists, and the board will go there for meetings, lots of girls in bikinis and drinking on the beach” sounds like a James Bond character who might do money laundering or smuggling, not a huge pedophile ring.
It’s an established pattern that these child abuse rings will do “accidental” things to see how folks respond. The attempt to get that girl at the Trump property? That was probably as much to check his reaction as to check hers– but Trump didn’t do the usual “What are you doing?” or the enabling-the-abuse thing, he went utterly ape and supported the girl going to the police, kicked the procurer out of his properties.
The usual is things like “accidentally” going into the wrong room, and apologizing profusely if there’s pushback, and keeping track so you don’t do that again.
And if there isn’t pushback, you push further.
They even mentioned this for the Sandusky scandal, with lots of kids mentioning there had been accidents where they got a sincere seeming sorry, and nothing ever happened again.
So Epstein gets rich with the cover-story, gets new contacts and customers from existing ones, and sorts through for who is useful for their child abuse ring, and who is a good shield because they can say things like this in absolute truth:
“Yeah, the investment firm sucked on returns, it’s totally a scam. Everybody goes there because the investment board gets to visit a tropical island and hang out with pretty girls brining you drinks all day. I went twice, wasn’t worth it to me, but eh there’s this tax loophole where if you invest it is pretty good, want me to connect you?”