In the summer of 1991, I went to Cambridge, England for a UCLA Summer Program. We lived for three weeks in Trinity Hall College (founded in the 14th Century to train canon lawyers),
and were able to take one of four different courses, taught by dons of the various colleges. I took a course entitled “Medieval English Society”, taught by Dr. Mark Bailey, of Gonville & Caius College. Before we arrived, we were given a reading list of various works about medieval society in general, and English society in particular. We were also given the opportunity to write a paper on one of a number of topics relating to the subject at hand (the instructor included some suggestions). Those of us who were taking the course for college credit were required to write a paper, and the rest of did not have to, but I decided to do it anyway. I have always been an early-music fan, and I decided to write a paper on medieval music, knowing that most of the music conventions we know today had their origins in the medieval period in Europe. So I picked up a couple of books on medieval music to read ahead of time, and found a nice cassette tape of Gregorian chant to play for the class.
When we arrived, after the first class, we were scheduled for a private meeting with the instructor to discuss our paper topic, if we were doing one. I had a very nice chat with Dr. Bailey, and he was enthusiastic about me writing a paper about medieval music, and said “You may teach me something, since I know nothing about medieval music”. So I got started shortly thereafter. I decided to use the format of a “timeline” of both music and the wider society, to tie the developments in the musical world to what was going on in the wider world of the time.
That class, and the three weeks I spent in Cambridge, were simply magical. We went on field trips around the Cambridge area, and went to the instructor’s college library to see some of the medieval manuscripts and books there. We ate in the gorgeous college dining hall,
and had a tot before dinner in the college bar (yes, Trinity Hall has its own bar). We went punting on the River Cam, and took tours of some of the other Colleges. At the last class period, those who had written papers did presentations of them for the class. One of us had been very secretive about her topic, and it turned out that she had been going to one of the local churches, and done a “rubbing” of one of the brass grave-markers of a local knight. Her rubbing was taller than she was, and it was just beautiful. I got much applause for my presentation on medieval music, and I felt it was a fitting end to a wonderful class.
I figured that my followers and readers might like to read my paper, so here it is (with some more-modern embellishments than I had available in the ancient times of 1991).
Medieval Music, In Concert With Its Times
Music has played a role in peoples’ lives from earliest times. Egyptian and early European art depicts people playing instruments such as the harp. Music accompanied much Greek and Roman entertainment; unfortunately, little is known about it since it was not written down. Greeks, in fact, had a very advanced music theory, to which medieval composers and theorists often referred.
The Middle Ages was a time of great changes in music, the Church, and in English society, with changes in one area reflected in others. At the start of the period, the Church was a dominating force in English society. The first Benedictine monastery had been established in Lindisfarne in 635, from whence the monks began their mission to convert the Anglo-Saxons to Christianity.
Music played a prominent part in the early Church; from the time of its establishment the unaccompanied singing or chanting of psalms was a feature of Christian worship. At first this singing was very simple, normally all on one note, with inflections up or down at the beginning or end of a phrase. As an aid in singing these chants, marks known as “neumes” were placed above the text, indicating whether the melodic line was rising or falling. The choir director also used hand signs to guide the singers.
Noticing that, as time passed, chants and the rest of the service were growing more complex and subject to wide regional variation, in about 590 Pope Gregory I attempted to organize a uniform Roman liturgy, hence “Gregorian” chant. He also established the Schola Cantorum in Rome, to train teachers and singers.
In the eighth and ninth centuries, the pace of change accelerated. Monasteries were becoming centers of learning, and this included music. Monks all over Europe were studying the ancient Greek music theories, and composing myriad new melodies for their chants. The monasteries were also becoming quite wealthy, due to endowments by the local aristocracy (when a lord or his lady died, money from the estate was donated to the monastery for the monks to say prayers for the family).
Around the year 850, a “Musical Handbook” described a more advanced chant, with two parts paralleling each other at intervals of a third, fifth, or octave. This came to be known as the “organum” style. With this, new words began to be added to the texts. Chants were now complicated enough that memorization was becoming nearly impossible. Around the year 1000, a monk called Guido of Arezzo fashioned a system of lines for the neumes, to indicate the pitch above or below a reference note. This marked the beginning of the development of modern music notation.
Guido of Arezzo
The next century brought a number of important developments in society, the Church, and music. The Mass achieved a relatively stable structure, being composed of invariable texts, called Ordinaries, and texts which varied with the day of the ecclesiastical year (Propers). Texts were originally taken from the Old and New Testaments, but were continually being revised and added to.
During the eleventh century, a trend toward increasing complexity became more evident. The changes and additions to the Mass, including many new melodies; the Papal reforms of Leo IX in 1046 which made the Papacy an international institution; the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 and the Domesday Book in 1086-87, which imposed a new way of life on the population; and the further ornamentation of architecture that characterized the late Romanesque period.
This was an especially rich period for musical developments. In secular music, goliards and jongleurs entertained the people with their characteristic song and dance music. Goliards were an educated group, often student ecclesiastics who had not yet taken priestly vows, who wandered through France, Germany, and Britain. Jongleurs were “jacks of all trades”, entertaining patrons (often scandalously) by singing, playing several instruments, and especially using the vernacular language (unlike the educated Goliards, who composed and sang in Latin). After the Norman Conquest, in Britain these performers were called Minstrels. Their songs were called “chansons de geste”, and consisted of accounts of heroic exploits. An important feature of the songs of the goliards and jongleurs was that they only contained one melody line.
As far as Church music was concerned, the Gregorian chant was becoming more ornamented, with more notes per syllable, and a wider range. Also introduced around this time, to an enthusiastic reception, was the “Church Opera”, a musical dramatization of a short Biblical story.
The system of musical notation was becoming more refined, with the addition of a rudimentary “clef” to indicate which note a staff line represented. This was especially necessary when the music was in more than one part. Again, Guido of Arezzo contributed this development.
The returning Crusaders had brought with them a variety of new instruments, both bowed and blown. These included the bowed Rebec and Vielle (ancestors of the violin and cello), and the shawm, a predecessor of the oboe. Already in use at the time were the harp, organ, kithara, and psaltery (in Church); and the lute, bagpipes, trumpet, horn, and various percussion instruments (secular).
The end of the eleventh century saw somewhat of a reaction to the radical developments that had taken place in the Church and church music. In 1098, the Cistercian order was founded, to try to return monasticism to its roots-to bring about a more personal relationship with Christ. The rise of the cult of the Virgin Mary also occurred at this time. In music, the St. Martial school at Limoges, France developed organa with rhythmically-independent parts; the Notre Dame school introduced a new system of basic long and short note values, with written notes being given both accent and meter; and the monastery of Santiago de Compostela in Spain was experimenting with three-part organa.
The Church authority, in keeping with the move toward greater simplicity, attempted to return a semblance of decorum to church music performance by banning the Church Operas. What this accomplished was to send these dramatizations out into the secular arena, where they developed into modern oratorio. Some abbots of this period expressed dismay at the rise of instruments and the introduction of part-music into the liturgy (Church fathers generally being quite conservative). In around 1150, Aelred, Abbot of Rievaulx, said: “Whence hath the Church so many organs and Musical Instruments? To what purpose, I pray you, is that terrible blowing of Belloes, expressing rather the crakes of Thunder than the sweetness of a voyce? To what purpose serves that contraction and inflection of the voyce? This man sings a base, that a small meane [i.e. the middle part], another a treble, a fourth divides and cuts asunder, as it were, certaine middle notes [i.e. improvising]. One while the voyce is strained, anon it is remitted, now it is dashed, and then again it is inlarged with a lowder sound, sometimes, which is a shame to speake, it is sharpened into the shrilness of a woman’s voyce; now and again it is writhed and retorted with a certain artificial circumevolution…In the meantime, the common people standing by, trembling and astonished, admire the sound of the organs, the noyse of the Cymballs andmusicall instruments, the harmony of the Pipes and Cornets.” [trenchant commenton “new music”!]
Unfortunately for Aelred and his cohorts, the movement toward more sophisticated music could not be contained. The twelfth century brought further advances in society and music. Universities were established in Bologna and Paris, leading to the decline of the wandering Goliards. The Crusaders had brought with them knowledge of ancient Arabian science and philosophy, and study of these took root in the monasteries, and in the new Universities. Troubadours and trouveres sang their songs of love in aristocratic court settings all over Europe, but especially in France. These poet-composers were often of noble blood. Indeed, Richard the Lionheart was said to be a fine troubadour.
Many of their songs have been preserved, as have the English dances (estampie) of this period.
The thirteenth century ushered in a period of convergence of sacred and secular styles of music. Part-music filtered out of the church into the popular arena, and a new style, the conductus, with two or three newly-composed parts (as distinct from variations of older themes) was introduced. The motet, a complicated form of conductus where the parts had different words, was also a product of this fertile period, and many composers contributed elaborate examples. Here is a very famous medieval song, one of the earliest known, Sumer is Icumen In (the Cuckoo Song).
It can be seen that a great variety of musical forms existed contemporaneously. They demonstrated a flexibility of melody and rhythm which required a better system of notation. Around the year 1250, a monk named Franco of Bologna developed a new notation system, which included a greater variety of available note values, including rests.
Other exciting events of what has been called the “medieval renaissance” included the establishment of the University of Cambridge in about 1209, Magna Carta in 1215, and the rise of Gothic architecture.
One saw an increasing naturalism, with the portrayal of plants and animals on decorated buildings. Latin translations of classical works were beginning to appear, Roger Bacon was contributing his scientific ideas, and towns were coming into their own as centers of commerce, government, and learning.
The last great period of the Middle Ages was characterized by sweeping changes that drastically altered the face of Western Europe. Early in the 1300s, bad weather caused a severe decline in agricultural productivity, and depressed the morale and general health of the people. In the Church, monasticism entered a period of decline; with the agricultural recession causing a decrease in endowments; a phasing-out of child oblation; and a decrease in the prestige of the monasteries. In many areas, the monasteries were increasingly accused of engaging in arrogant behavior, and the communities’ reaction to this was demonstrated by such things as the “Roman de Fauvel”, a satirical poem attacking the Church, and the attacks on the Abbey of Bury St. Edmonds. There was a decline in the “community” in favor of the individual, and abbots began to become more secular, living separately from their monks. In 1378, this trend culminated in the Great Schism, with the Papacy being divided between Rome and Avignon, France.
Medieval society was also irrevocably altered by the plagues which ravaged Europe, decimating the population and upsetting traditional feudal relationships. Increasing mobility of the people, in part caused by attempts to escape the plague; the rise of widespread wage labor, giving free peasants some measure of leverage over landlords; government experiments with taxation methods, leading to peasant uprisings; and the increasing power and influence of towns and their merchants and burghers. All these changes were indicators of a society that was to give greater emphasis and responsibility to the individual, eventually reaching its peak in the advances of the Renaissance period.
In music, this was a time of consolidation and innovation. There was a more general use of instruments in addition to the voice (including the more modern organ with a keyboard). A new song form, the madrigal, made its appearance, its accessibility increased by the fact that it was sing in the vernacular. Philippe de Vitri (1316-1325) introduced his “Ars Nova”, which described a new, more-flexible notation, emphasizing duple time, and making possible a greater variety of rhythm patterns. Syncopation became more widely used, and deVitri also introduced a forerunner of today’s key signature (at the beginning of every staff line).
As a result of Pope John XXII’s ban on the use of the motet in church (1324-25), composers turned more toward secular writing, and were concerned with the “vertical” aspect of their melodies, i.e. how the parts ft together into a unified whole. The forerunner of the harpsichord was developed in England, and French music was even featured at the court of the French Pope.
In general, the period of the Middle Ages saw the gradual transition from ancient to modern forms, in social structures, the Church, and in music. The decline of feudalism and rise of agricultural capitalism; the de-emphasis on authoritarian Christianity and monasticism and strengthening of the secular clergy; and the advances in musical forms and notation all are indicators of a trend toward freedom, knowledge, and the power of the individual.
At the beginning of the Middle Ages, music was mainly heard in church, and Gregorian chant was very simple, with not need for accompaniment or a written language. By the fourteenth century, music could be found in every corner of society, a plethora of instruments was in general use, dozens of composers were generating many new types of multi-part church and secular compositions, and the system of notation was modern enough to enable new pieces to be easily taught, learned, and disseminated. Truly, this was a time of momentous accomplishments.
Finally, here is how a very modern English musical group, Steeleye Span, interprets an Medieval Christmas song, Gaudete.
I decided to try out the new Independent Publisher theme. How do you like it? I thought it would better display my “in the works” long-form writing. It’s a piece of writing I did a long time ago, but it was well-received, and I’m having fun adding features that I couldn’t include in the original, like pictures and video. So stay tuned to Calling-all-Rushbabes.
They go and intervene in a lawsuit by terrorism victims against the Palestinian Authority…on the side of the Palestinians! I have said many times that OTL is an Arab Sympathizer… This story on the Fox News site today, really takes the cake! Instead of a link, I reprint the story below in its entirety. Do YOU support this?
Attorneys for 11 American families who won a potential billion-dollar judgment against the Palestinian leadership, which a federal jury blamed for a string of deadly terror attacks, say the U.S. government took the side of terrorists when it weighed in on the case Monday.
The State and Justice departments filed a “statement of interest” in the case known as Sokolow v. PLO, urging U.S. District Judge George Daniels not to force the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian Liberation Organization to post bond of up to $30 million per month while it appeals the jury’s February decision. Daniels had previously said he may require the bond as “some meaningful demonstration that the defendant is ready and willing to pay the judgment.”
“The State Department should stand on the side of the American terror victims and not on the side of the Palestinian suicide bombers.”
– Nitsana Darshan Leitner, attorney for victims’ families
In the statement and an accompanying affidavit from Deputy Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, the government warned that requiring the cash-strapped Palestinian government to make the bond payments could leave its ability to govern “severely compromised.”
” … the continued viability of the PA is essential to key U.S. security and diplomatic interests, including advancing peace between Israel and the Palestinians, supporting the security of U.S. allies such as Israel, Jordan and Egypt, combating extremism and terrorism, and promoting good governance,” read Blinken’s affidavit.
The government said it supported the rights of the victims to pursue justice, and condemned the acts of terror underpinning the civil suit, initially filed a decade ago, but objected to the bond requirement. The move was anticipated by the families’ lawyers, who told FoxNews.com last week that the federal government was preparing the statement.
“The State Department should stand on the side of the American terror victims and not on the side of the Palestinian suicide bombers,” attorney Nitsana Darshan Leitner told FoxNews.com Tuesday.
Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas continues a longstanding practice of paying jailed terrorists and families of suicide bombers.
The families’ legal team bitterly cites the fact that the Palestinian government continues to pay imprisoned terrorists and the families of suicide bombers as evidence it has money to meet its legal obligations.
“The State Department ignores the fact that the Palestinians continue to pay monthly payments to imprisoned terrorists and to the families of the suicide bombers, who devastated the lives of the victims in this case,” Darshan Leitner said. “If the Palestinians have the funds to continue making these payments, they certainly have the funds to post a bond.”
The Department of Justice declined to comment on the case. A State Department spokesperson rejected the charge that the Obama administration was siding against American citizens.
“This filing is a statement of the interests of the United States and not on behalf of any party,” the spokesperson told FoxNews.com. “It addresses the critical U.S. national security and foreign policy interests that should be considered.”
The families won a $218.5 million judgment in February after a seven-week trial in Manhattan Federal Court in which a jury found the Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority were responsible for a string of attacks from 2001 to 2004 that killed 33 and injured hundreds. A 1992 law that requires damages in such cases to be tripled, as well as interest on the award, would push it to as much as $1.1 billion. The judgment, which the Palestinians are appealing, would equal nearly a third of the Palestinian Authority’s annual operating budget.
Another member of the families’ legal team, Kent Yalowitz, echoed Leitner’s claim that the Palestinian leadership cannot claim poverty while paying killers. But he applauded language in the statement that appeared to back his clients’ ultimate right to collect damages.
“We are gratified that the Department of Justice supports the rights of survivors of international terrorism to enforce their rights and collect the judgment but disappointed that the State Department failed to take any stand against the PLO and PA’s policy of putting convicted terrorists on their payroll as soon as they are jailed,” said Yalowitz.
For some reason, I’ve been paying attention to clouds lately, and noticing the many different form that water vapor in our atmosphere can take. From fluffy white, to menacing dark gray, to wispy mares’ tails, clouds are just beautiful to gaze upon. I’ve taken some new photos, and brought together some from my photo library. Here are a few to start with.
I always thought this looked like a “lid on the world”.
And then, there’s a view of clouds, from an airplane flying above them. They look like cotton balls.
I didn’t think I’d have need to use this photograph again. My friends and I have been heartsick the past week, as the videos detailing the evil done by Planned Parenthood have been gradually revealed in videos. Just when it seems that the situation could not be more terrifying, the pro-life group releases a new video of Planned Parenthood’s evil operations.
Most of the people I hold dear-my Ricochet friends, my husband, my hero Rush Limbaugh are simply horrified, that there are people who can talk among themselves so nonchalantly, about tiny human beings, literally chopped up in pieces shortly after having emerged from their mothers’ wombs, and sold to a company called “Stem Express” for use in what they call “medical research”. Baby parts have a Price Structure! They give legitimate medical research a bad name. Many have mentioned the similarity to the depredations of the Nazi, Josef Mengele, who did horrific experiments on Jews in the concentration camps of World War II Europe.
And that the high-ranking members of the Democrat Party can defend this evil practice, makes me despair of our culture, here in the United States of America. And Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democrat candidate for president in 2016 (maybe not so much now), referring to a “woman’s right to choose”!! Let’s describe it as it really is, a woman’s right to destroy her own baby.
And then, there’s the person who inhabits the White House, also defending evil in his own back yard. But, for him that’s par for the course. As an Illinois State Senator, Obama helped defeat a bill that would have saved babies born alive after botched abortion procedures. No, it’s more important for the woman to be able to choose death for her child.
Our souls weep, for the souls, of all the thousands of babies, brutally murdered by an organization that touts its provision of “women’ health care”. Be honest, Planned Parenthood. Admit that your real business is brutal murder of unborn children.
And, oh yes, I’d forgotten. Your TAXPAYER DOLLARS are paying for this! Call your Senator and Congressman now, and demand the de-funding of Planned Parenthood Butchery!