Please first notice the header image of Lindsay Clancy. Can you just see the thought bubble? That woman is scary.
This horrific case of a young mother strangling her three children to death is a terrible demonstration of the harmful effects of Radical Feminism. Not only does it show that feminist women become inured to the deaths of children, maybe stemming from their willingness to murder their children before birth (abortion); but through the demonstrations of support for Clancy shown by women outside the trial we see how a person who admitted that she strangled her babies is not condemned for being a murderer, but supported because she was “mentally ill” when she did it!
Then, the judge in the Massachusetts courtroom tainted the jury while giving them his orders before they deliberated! He purposely told them that they could return a verdict of Manslaughter rather than First Degree Murder “if they chose to.” That leaves them an out, if their support for the confessed murderer makes them unwilling to convict her for the heinous murder that she confessed to committing. Finally, the judge did NOT sequester the jury, so they would leave at the end of the day, walking past all the insane women supporters outside the courtroom! We found out today that a crazed woman supporter outside, followed the jurors, filmed them, and was arrested for it. What a circus!
It seems that the jury has stated more than once that they are deadlocked, but the judge keeps them deliberating. The fact that the jury is heavily weighted with women, you can get a pretty good idea of who might be delaying a unanimous verdict (maybe the three MEN on the jury!).
Two female jurors wore pink in the courtroom today. Illegal support for the defendant? Many are saying Yes.
I’m just repeating what a few other women already said out loud:
If Lindsay Clancy walks on this, every woman in a high-stakes job just got a new target on her back.
Female pilot? Cool. Now the first thing people will ask is whether she’s hormonal, postpartum, or one bad night from crashing a plane into a mountain.
Female president? You want the nuclear codes in the hands of someone who can snap and then call it “a psychosis”?
That’s the door this verdict opens. And it won’t close.
If she is not found guilty of murdering those three kids, women don’t get compassion.
We get suspicion. Forever.
Prosecute her as a murderer, or watch one “crazy bitch” torch the credibility of every woman who still has to prove she can be trusted with other people’s lives.
This seems like a Catch-22 situation for Radical Feminists, who believe that women belong in the workplace and not at home raising their children. If she loses, they are angry that the jurors didn’t credit her with mental illness and feel sorry for her having to spend the rest of her life in prison (MA doesn’t have the death penalty, even though Clancy deserves it). If she gets off, then EVERY woman in the workplace is immediately under the microscope, in case she is under the influence of hormones and may be unstable.
In either event, her three beautiful children are STILL DEAD.
Calling-all-RushBabes 